1,136
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 05:53, 10 September 2009
, 10 September 2009moved section "Huw Powel removed four similar wikis from the RationalWiki article" to "Similar wikis" section
(→See also: changed to "similar wikis") |
(moved section "Huw Powel removed four similar wikis from the RationalWiki article" to "Similar wikis" section) |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
RationalWiki is a controversial wiki. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 08:16, 9 July 2009 (EDT) | RationalWiki is a controversial wiki. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 08:16, 9 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
===Huw Powel removed four similar wikis from the RationalWiki article=== | |||
(Note, this is the last edit before they were all moved to the talk pages. Coincidence?) | |||
[[User_talk:Huw_Powell#Removing_four_similar_wikis_from_the_RationalWiki_article|I have inquired as to how this is helping WikiIndex, on his talk page]]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:31, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:How were they "similar", apart from being wikis? An encyclopedia; RW is not. A parody of a conservative encyclopedia, RW is not; what were the other two? An atheism wiki? RW is not. ??? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 22:14, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
::Do you have a brain tumor or is the cat walking on your keyboard? They have similar content, OBVIOUSLY. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:39, 10 September 2009 (EDT) (I'm not really as frustrated as I sound, I only talk like this to Huw because that is how he talks to everyone else. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:50, 10 September 2009 (EDT) ) | |||
''See also is for related things. Categories are for similar things. Only those wikis that are actually related (besides Proxima Centauri having an account on all of them) should be listed on see also. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:04, 9 September 2009 (EDT)'' (quote by Lumenos) | |||
:I'll change the section title to "Similar wikis". [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:50, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
==What Conservapedia thinks about RationalWiki== | ==What Conservapedia thinks about RationalWiki== | ||
| Line 416: | Line 427: | ||
After having read this article I must say even I have learned interesting facts about RationalWiki, I particularly liked the in-depth tag coverage. Keep up the good work!. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 14:09, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | After having read this article I must say even I have learned interesting facts about RationalWiki, I particularly liked the in-depth tag coverage. Keep up the good work!. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 14:09, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:What is tag coverage? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:39, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | :What is tag coverage? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:39, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Could it be |337 h@x0r5? == | == Could it be |337 h@x0r5? == | ||