3
edits
Talk:RationalWikiWiki: Difference between revisions
So what's the deal?
False Flag (talk | contribs) (→Controversial?: eh?) |
False Flag (talk | contribs) (So what's the deal?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==When agreed upon to move to article page (see [[User_talk:This_is_not_the_solution#Thanks_to_everyone_for_the_cooling_off_-_here_is_my_idea_on_how_to_move_through_this.|here]])== | ==When agreed upon to move to article page (see [[User_talk:This_is_not_the_solution#Thanks_to_everyone_for_the_cooling_off_-_here_is_my_idea_on_how_to_move_through_this.|here]])== | ||
'''RationalWikiWiki''' is a small Wiki that comments on [[RationalWiki]]. It was part of the [[ScribbleWiki]] [[Wiki farm]] but moved before things broke down there, and is now hosted on the same server as RationalWiki. | '''RationalWikiWiki''' is a small Wiki that comments on [[RationalWiki]]. It was part of the [[ScribbleWiki]] [[Wiki farm]] but moved before things broke down there, and is now hosted on the same server as RationalWiki. | ||
==Controversial?== | ==Controversial?== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 17: | ||
::::: I am fascinated by the way different wiki seem to run on different timescales. The biggest wiki run amazingly fast -- an edit I make there is often responded to within minutes; a week ago was ancient history. The WikiIndex (with the exception of a certain prolific poster), like most wiki, runs at a much slower pace -- my edits are often the latest edit to a page for weeks; a year ago was ancient history. The original wiki seems even slower. My edits there are often the latest edit to a page for years. Many people claim the original wiki, and perhaps some other wiki, exists in a kind of eternal "WikiNow" ([[Wiki: WikiNow]]). --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 13:24, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::: I am fascinated by the way different wiki seem to run on different timescales. The biggest wiki run amazingly fast -- an edit I make there is often responded to within minutes; a week ago was ancient history. The WikiIndex (with the exception of a certain prolific poster), like most wiki, runs at a much slower pace -- my edits are often the latest edit to a page for weeks; a year ago was ancient history. The original wiki seems even slower. My edits there are often the latest edit to a page for years. Many people claim the original wiki, and perhaps some other wiki, exists in a kind of eternal "WikiNow" ([[Wiki: WikiNow]]). --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 13:24, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::So .... there was some debate about this article at the end of June 2009, and as a consequence it was cut to the talk page in early September 2009? I agree that different wikis may work on different time-scales - but one might argue that taking two months to react to a problem and after everything seems to have settled down is a bit glacial.--[[User:False Flag|False Flag]] 11:05, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::::So .... there was some debate about this article at the end of June 2009, and as a consequence it was cut to the talk page in early September 2009? I agree that different wikis may work on different time-scales - but one might argue that taking two months to react to a problem and after everything seems to have settled down is a bit glacial.--[[User:False Flag|False Flag]] 11:05, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::::Anyway, I've edited it to remove the downtime stuff. It certainly ain't controvertible now! So what's the deal? Where are the syspos?--[[User:False Flag|False Flag]] 12:31, 11 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
==Move to article page - vote== | ==Move to article page - vote== | ||