146
edits
(→The lunatics have taken over the asylum.: sorry I thought he added the comment after I deleted the other. I'll try to be more careful in the future.) |
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1,391: | Line 1,391: | ||
:In addition, the only controversial bit in ''any'' of the articles, the bit on RW's downtime, is now outdated. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 10:34, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | :In addition, the only controversial bit in ''any'' of the articles, the bit on RW's downtime, is now outdated. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 10:34, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Umm how are you judging that? I didn't feel like edit waring over the issue of allowing more criticism, but now it looks like we are headed for [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#How_sympathetic_or_critical.3F_.28Who_decides.3F.29|entire pages devoted to criticism]]. I could be wrong. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:55, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ::Umm how are you judging that? I didn't feel like edit waring over the issue of allowing more criticism, but now it looks like we are headed for [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#How_sympathetic_or_critical.3F_.28Who_decides.3F.29|entire pages devoted to criticism]]. I could be wrong. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:55, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Having fun? You're the only one who seems to think there is a controversy... Oh, and just because the spellchecker doesn't flag "waring" doesn't mean it's the right word. Just in case you are using it in policy development pages. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 02:33, 12 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
== Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity == | == Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity == |
edits