1,136
edits
WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines (view source)
Revision as of 21:24, 13 September 2009
, 13 September 2009→Administrative powers: Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 Sysops and 3 people involved in the conflict]". When ''what'' is agreed upon? The only people I've come across, who seem to possi
mNo edit summary |
(→Administrative powers: Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 Sysops and 3 people involved in the conflict]". When ''what'' is agreed upon? The only people I've come across, who seem to possi) |
||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
::::What is the purpose of doing this? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:06, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::What is the purpose of doing this? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:06, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::How can editors avoid this happening, in the future? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:06, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::How can editors avoid this happening, in the future? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:06, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::What do editors have to do, in order to have the article pages unprotected? "[http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Talk%3ARationalWiki&diff=70872&oldid=70839 Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 Sysops and 3 people involved in the conflict]" [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] | ::::What do editors have to do, in order to have the article pages unprotected? We are told, "[http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Talk%3ARationalWiki&diff=70872&oldid=70839 Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 Sysops and 3 people involved in the conflict]". When ''what'' is agreed upon? The only people I've come across, who seem to possibly want the article protected is [[MarkDilley]] and maybe [[DavidCary]]. So everyone I thought was involved in the conflict presently, (I think that is just me and whoever is still left of the RationalWiki mafia ;-) don't want the article protected. We already agree on that. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 17:24, 13 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::Are we supposed to be agreeing on a version of the article? If that is the case, it would seem you would have to protect the article after this version is moved out. This seems to contradict the spirit of [[OpenEdit]] and is not ideal. If we are not going to protect the version that is moved out, then I suppose there would need to be some guideline as how the article may be altered, after it is moved out. Like that certain things should not be added or deleted, from the article. Otherwise I don't see this as any different than agreeing to unprotect the page (and reopening "conflict"). (Although I think there is less "conflict" now that Proxima and Nx are less interested in WikiIndex.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 17:24, 13 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
* '''Oversite:''' I believe this means removing something from edit histories, logs, etc. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:10, 13 September 2009 (EDT) | * '''Oversite:''' I believe this means removing something from edit histories, logs, etc. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 15:10, 13 September 2009 (EDT) | ||