1,136
edits
(→On what features or qualities should we compare any wikis (or these wikis in particular)?: (moving inactive wikis out of categories, etc)) |
|||
| Line 317: | Line 317: | ||
::Like talking to yourself? Oh, and what wikis are we supposed to be comparing? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 23:05, 17 September 2009 (EDT) | ::Like talking to yourself? Oh, and what wikis are we supposed to be comparing? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 23:05, 17 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::The irony of your statement is that after you reply to one of these, I'm no longer "talking to myself" (keeping notes publicly). [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 19:35, 18 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::My proposal is to compare any of the "related wikis". Those would be the ones in the same categories, or the ones listed under "see also". Nx posted a list, but I've found some of those to be inactive wikis. This isn't a high priority for me at the moment. I'm guessing you think this to be a bad or unrealistic idea? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 19:35, 18 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
::::I think we should also move wikis that have been inactive or unavailable, out of the categories. Do this by putting a colon before the category like so "[[:category:creationism]]", so that it will appear as a link in the dead wiki's article, but the wiki will not show up in the category. This would make the categories more useful for finding similar wikis, as Nx suggested. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 19:35, 18 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
==Should [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] (ASK) be included as a "similar wiki" or in a comparison table?== | ==Should [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]] (ASK) be included as a "similar wiki" or in a comparison table?== | ||
edits