RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
684 bytes removed ,  19 September 2009
→‎Criticism: rm idiocy
(→‎Criticism: link to notability of critical reviews)
(→‎Criticism: rm idiocy)
Line 46: Line 46:
==Criticism==
==Criticism==
Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]  Could it be that an "anonymous" WikiIndex editor disagrees?
Philip J. Rayment once said that RationalWiki was, "[A] place of filthy and blasphemous language, replete with name-calling, smearing, innuendo, hypocrisy, and other undesirable attributes".[http://www.astorehouseofknowledge.info/index.php?title=User_talk:Philip_J._Rayment&diff=14129&oldid=14127]  Could it be that an "anonymous" WikiIndex editor disagrees?
Another "anonymous" editor also once made the unsubstantiated claim that the following claim is unsubstantiated: "[[Wikipedia]] achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki, better than RationalWiki does."[[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|[2]]] This despite the fact that it would seem to be a measurable fact to someone who scored 101670, receiving a "Ultra Genius" ranking, at the online game of Atomica.
If only WikiIndex editors and administers, could work together to create an [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines|inclusion policy]] on [[WikiIndex_talk:Policies_and_Guidelines#Notability|notability of critical reviews]], issues such as these may be easier to resolve.


==See also==
==See also==

Navigation menu