6,456
edits
WikiIndex talk:Naming conventions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Other pages: CamelCase redirects okay with me
(→Other pages: standards are good) |
(→Other pages: CamelCase redirects okay with me) |
||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
* I actually prefer CamelCase for internal work, but felt it too hard to argue for it in a "WikipediaWorld." I prefer CamelCase based on my prefered way to show internal links and a good way to help people understand wiki. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | * I actually prefer CamelCase for internal work, but felt it too hard to argue for it in a "WikipediaWorld." I prefer CamelCase based on my prefered way to show internal links and a good way to help people understand wiki. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | ||
:: I don't mind CamelCase, and in fact, notwithstanding my comments below wishing for a standard, I'm fine with every meta page having a CamelCase redirect. Or redirecting the other way, if that's what we decide. [[Add a Wiki]] is the worst of both worlds. I'd prefer [[Add a wiki]] or [[AddAWiki]] (which brings up the question of the word "a", is it to be capitalized in CamelCase? This is complication I'd rather avoid. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:01, 7 Mar 2006 (EST) | |||
I respect Mark's "open" approach. However, I recommend that we '''encourage''' sentence case. Reasons: | I respect Mark's "open" approach. However, I recommend that we '''encourage''' sentence case. Reasons: | ||