1
edit
RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(undid last edit by Phantom Hoover, unsubstantiated and biased) |
Sophiegreen (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
Someone posted a criticism here. | Someone posted a criticism here. | ||
:One anonymous WikiIndex editor made the unsubstantiated claim that the following criticism is unsubstantiated (but not that it isn't plausible or probable): | :One anonymous WikiIndex editor made the unsubstantiated claim of the [http://www.superiorpapers.com custom research paper] that the following criticism is unsubstantiated (but not that it isn't plausible or probable): | ||
::By editing Wikipedia instead of RationalWiki, one is probably more likely to persuade someone away from pseudoscience. This is due to Wikipedia's larger and more diverse audience, and its requirement of evidence in the form of reliable sources. ([[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|link to debate]]) | ::By editing Wikipedia instead of RationalWiki, one is probably more likely to persuade someone away from pseudoscience. This is due to Wikipedia's larger and more diverse audience, and its requirement of evidence in the form of reliable sources. ([[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|link to debate]]) | ||
:::A few editors here (one is anonymous, the rest are RationalWiki bureaucrats) make the confused claim that Wikipedia's policy of a neutral point of view, is contrary to a "scientific" point of view. ([[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|link to debate]]) | :::A few editors here (one is anonymous, the rest are RationalWiki bureaucrats) make the confused claim that Wikipedia's policy of a neutral point of view, is contrary to a "scientific" point of view. ([[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|link to debate]]) | ||