RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  30 October 2009
m
Stats; spelling
(Updating stats, fuck knows why. Could 112 people go look at the article of Russell's teapot?)
m (Stats; spelling)
Line 19: Line 19:
* Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism.
* Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism.


RationalWiki has about 3,335 registered accounts, of which 391 (or 11.72%) have [[Sysop]]s rights, which are awarded very liberally by the [[bureaucrat]]s.
RationalWiki has about 3,335 registered accounts, of which 396 (or 11.75%) have [[Sysop]]s rights, which are awarded very liberally by the [[bureaucrat]]s.


RationalWiki runs a large collection of specially customized extensions allowing a wide range of features such as; up-down voting, slider voting, a site wide intercom system, and easy bible quotations.
RationalWiki runs a large collection of specially customized extensions allowing a wide range of features such as; up-down voting, slider voting, a site wide intercom system, and easy bible quotations.
Line 27: Line 27:
{{Size
{{Size
| statistics URL = http://www.rationalwiki.com/wiki/Special:Statistics
| statistics URL = http://www.rationalwiki.com/wiki/Special:Statistics
| pages = 3611
| pages = 3636
| wikiFactor = 17
| wikiFactor = 18
| wikiFactor URL = http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Special:PopularPages
| wikiFactor URL = http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Special:PopularPages
}}
}}
Line 36: Line 36:


==RationalWiki today==
==RationalWiki today==
While [[Conservapedia]] continues to be a major source of traffic to RationalWiki (Mainly, [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F RationalWiki: What is going on at Conservapedia?]), they have branched out into many areas of skepticism.  Many articles focus on unfounded medical claims, pseudoscience, and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly anti-religious stance, some editors are practicing Christians, Jews, Muslims, or Odinists (among others) tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism.
While [[Conservapedia]] continues to be a major source of traffic to RationalWiki (Mainly, [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F RationalWiki: What is going on at Conservapedia?]), they have branched out into many areas of skepticism.  Many articles focus on unfounded medical claims, pseudoscience, and Biblical literalism. Despite a seemingly anti-religious stance, some editors are practising Christians, Jews, Muslims, or Odinists (among others) tending towards the more liberal aspects of their religion rather than fundamentalism.


The site works to refute a range of faith-based ideas and superstitions. They have critical material on Scientology, {{tag|Creationism}}, {{tag|Astrology}}, "New Age" philosophy, and many others.  It also comments critically on other Christian creationist wikis notably [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]], see [[RationalWiki:A_Storehouse_of_Knowledge| RationalWiki: A Storehouse of Knowledge]].
The site works to refute a range of faith-based ideas and superstitions. They have critical material on Scientology, {{tag|Creationism}}, {{tag|Astrology}}, "New Age" philosophy, and many others.  It also comments critically on other Christian creationist wikis notably [[A Storehouse of Knowledge]], see [[RationalWiki:A_Storehouse_of_Knowledge| RationalWiki: A Storehouse of Knowledge]].
81

edits

Navigation menu