5,637
edits
(SaveAfterPreview) |
(→PayToEdit?: Creating category) |
||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
:: p.s.: I disagree with the idea that *mentioning* something is the same as "promoting" something. Surely the fact that I mention the "[[Flu Wiki|avian flu virus]]", doesn't mean that I "promote" the spread of that virus? | :: p.s.: I disagree with the idea that *mentioning* something is the same as "promoting" something. Surely the fact that I mention the "[[Flu Wiki|avian flu virus]]", doesn't mean that I "promote" the spread of that virus? | ||
:: --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 17:41, 10 March 2008 (EDT) | :: --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 17:41, 10 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::I like the idea that this site lists all wikis: good, bad, and ugly. My perception is that there is a consensus here that we are allowed to add negative comments to a wiki's entry in the index, so when there's a concern such as this, we can address it by adding commentary to the page. I think I'll go ahead and create this category. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 15:28, 12 March 2010 (EST) | |||
== SaveAfterPreview == | == SaveAfterPreview == | ||
What about a "SaveAfterPreview" category for wikis such as [[MARJORIE-WIKI]]? --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 15:23, 12 March 2010 (EST) | What about a "SaveAfterPreview" category for wikis such as [[MARJORIE-WIKI]]? --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 15:23, 12 March 2010 (EST) | ||