5,637
edits
User talk:MarvelZuvembie: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→http stub: Reply
(→http stub: :-)) |
(→http stub: Reply) |
||
| Line 180: | Line 180: | ||
:Hi Wolf. Thanks for your letting me know. My question is, if it doesn't have a link, do we really want to categorize it? I see that Ted Ernst doesn't think we should. [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Category:YourWikiHttp&diff=33034&oldid=32961] Alternatively, perhaps we could put a comment in the boilerplate saying "Use http://". --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 16:43, 25 March 2010 (EDT) | :Hi Wolf. Thanks for your letting me know. My question is, if it doesn't have a link, do we really want to categorize it? I see that Ted Ernst doesn't think we should. [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Category:YourWikiHttp&diff=33034&oldid=32961] Alternatively, perhaps we could put a comment in the boilerplate saying "Use http://". --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 16:43, 25 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
:: I think, to know that we have an entry without an URL is not so useful as to make clear that the http-syntax has to be used. I think you are right with your change. Maybe we should better try to change the [[template:wiki]] to meet your point (but that's really hard stuff). --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 17:08, 25 March 2010 (EDT) | :: I think, to know that we have an entry without an URL is not so useful as to make clear that the http-syntax has to be used. I think you are right with your change. Maybe we should better try to change the [[template:wiki]] to meet your point (but that's really hard stuff). --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 17:08, 25 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
:::Yes, I can imagine that it would be. Will the comment break it, though? Maybe that's the better solution? --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 17:42, 25 March 2010 (EDT) | |||