1,136
edits
Talk:WikiSynergy: Difference between revisions
→Copyright-- nofollow attribute
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
They put this in a section titled, "Attribution" but I wonder if this is really want is meant by "attribution" in a Creative Commons license. From CC-BY-SA-3.0 "Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work)." It is difficult to say whether removing nofollow, is more like an "endorsement" or "attribution". The purpose of it must be to give them higher rankings with search engines. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:39, 20 September 2009 (EDT) | They put this in a section titled, "Attribution" but I wonder if this is really want is meant by "attribution" in a Creative Commons license. From CC-BY-SA-3.0 "Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work)." It is difficult to say whether removing nofollow, is more like an "endorsement" or "attribution". The purpose of it must be to give them higher rankings with search engines. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 18:39, 20 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I raised the issue there and Purple Scissor removed the requirement to remove the nofollow property! In case anyone cares, this makes WikiSynergy my new favorite wiki. Aren't they lucky? =) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 22:50, 12 June 2010 (EDT) | |||