1,136
edits
WikiIndex talk:Blocking and banning policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Comparing the block policy proposals: rewrote comment on block policy, I now see one way it is different than WP
m (→Biographical info: deleting some of my dated comments) |
(→Comparing the block policy proposals: rewrote comment on block policy, I now see one way it is different than WP) |
||
| Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
::I guess I figured it is text so no one has to read it. It wasn't until you and Dilley told me to slow down, etc, that I realized anyone was bothered by it. I don't have a problem with relocating my comments if they are excessive. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 22:21, 22 June 2010 (EDT) | ::I guess I figured it is text so no one has to read it. It wasn't until you and Dilley told me to slow down, etc, that I realized anyone was bothered by it. I don't have a problem with relocating my comments if they are excessive. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 22:21, 22 June 2010 (EDT) | ||
DavidCary's [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=WikiIndex_talk%3ABlocking_Policy&diff=70363&oldid=70362 original proposal] begins by saying it is "is pretty much the same" as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy Wikipedia's block policy]. There was one important difference I noticed between WikiIndex' block policy, and Wikipedia's, but I don't want to mention it. If that is still the case the block policy shouldn't say it "is pretty much the same" Wikipedia. But I do think most of Wikipedia's block policy is along the lines of what is needed as a '''guide for sysops''', who are considering blocking a "troll" or editor who is "edit warring", disruptive/bickering/obnoxious/threatening/harassing, engaging in "gray spamming" (not obvious "spamming"), etc. | |||
''"Don't irk our gentle editors"'' opens the door to blocking people simply because someone is "irked", not because any rule was broken. Perhaps this is the '''real''' rule, but I think there should be some sort of guide for sysops. At least one "sysop" did what Dilley's suggested; they posted warnings, then blocked. But this block was not upheld by Dilley (or maybe the owner). | |||
''"People may be blocked [...] to protect WikiIndex and its editors from harm."'' That sysop may have believed that they were protecting themselves from "harm". There is no definition of "harm" here. Using terms like "harm" and "nonviolence", when we are only interacting through computers, seems exaggerated and vague. | |||
Sysops need to know what is an appropriate reason for a block and what is not. I think [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy Wikipedia's block policy] is an excellent guide for sysops and they probably already know the important differences between WP's block policy and WikiIndex' block policy. | |||
[[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:37, 23 June 2010 (EDT) | |||