WikiIndex:Admin Notes: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
rearranging a litte
(invitation for people to add their thoughts and ideas - not just the folks I invited. :-) Best, MarkDilley)
(rearranging a litte)
Line 5: Line 5:
* ''Oh, and yes, I know about the favicon and will fix as soon as possible ...''
* ''Oh, and yes, I know about the favicon and will fix as soon as possible ...''
::One common extension we don't have is [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Renameuser Extension:Renameuser], which allows bureaucrats the ability to change the name of an account. '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''', 10 14 2010
::One common extension we don't have is [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Renameuser Extension:Renameuser], which allows bureaucrats the ability to change the name of an account. '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''', 10 14 2010
:: Also, how about:
:: Also, how about Semantic MediaWiki
::* Semantic Wiki (allows if statements which can help make better infoboxes and other stuff too)
::* Semantic Wiki (allows if statements which can help make better infoboxes and other stuff too)
: Making WikiIndex a semantic wiki with the extensions. - I like this, ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
: Making WikiIndex a semantic wiki with the extensions. - I like this, ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
: I would like to consider if we would like to move to a semantic MediaWiki - I am asking now if all that is, is the extension. This is an estimate I got from Yaron Koren of WikiWorks.com:
: Update of existing code: .5 hour
: Updating site copy: 2 hours
: Installing SMW and related extensions: 1 hour
: Setting up wiki for SMW, including re-arranging category structure: 5 hours
What do folks think?  ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
::* CITE (allows easy creation of references)
::* CITE (allows easy creation of references)
::: I almost forgot about the cite extension, that's practically mandatory, and semantic would not be a bad idea either. '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''', 10 16 2010
::: I almost forgot about the cite extension, that's practically mandatory, and semantic would not be a bad idea either. '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''', 10 16 2010
Line 24: Line 32:
: I don't see a need to rebrand right now, even under vector.  I must admit to being biased to the current logo though :-) ~~ [[MarkDilley]]  p.s. look at past [[logo]] ideas too.
: I don't see a need to rebrand right now, even under vector.  I must admit to being biased to the current logo though :-) ~~ [[MarkDilley]]  p.s. look at past [[logo]] ideas too.


=== Semantic MediaWiki ===
I would like to consider if we would like to move to a semantic MediaWiki - I am asking now if all that is, is the extension. This is an estimate I got from Yaron Koren of WikiWorks.com:


: Update of existing code: .5 hour
: Updating site copy: 2 hours
: Installing SMW and related extensions: 1 hour
: Setting up wiki for SMW, including re-arranging category structure: 5 hours
What do folks think?  ~~ [[MarkDilley]]


==Dreamhost Disaster==
==Dreamhost Disaster==
Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160

edits

Navigation menu