Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160
edits
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→Logo: add my thoughts) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) m (→Logo) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:: Understood; I was thinking that we'd also move from monobook to vector when we did the upgrade. Example at [http://www.ICANNWiki.com. ICANNWiki.com] [[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> | :: Understood; I was thinking that we'd also move from monobook to vector when we did the upgrade. Example at [http://www.ICANNWiki.com. ICANNWiki.com] [[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> | ||
: I don't see a need to rebrand right now, even under vector. I must admit to being biased to the current logo though :-) ~~ [[MarkDilley]] p.s. look at past [[logo]] ideas too. | : I don't see a need to rebrand right now, even under vector. I must admit to being biased to the current logo though :-) ~~ [[MarkDilley]] p.s. look at past [[logo]] ideas too. | ||
:: To the right, I am suggesting a rebranding using the same image and different lettering - with the image above the text - also this is the favicon we have had for a while, lost recently. Many complements of the logo, thus my pushing for keeping it is some fashion. :-) ~~ [[MarkDilley]] [[Image:WikiIndexLogoIdeasOct2010.png|Right]] | :: To the right, I am suggesting a rebranding using the same image and different lettering - with the image above the text - also this is the favicon we have had for a while, lost recently. Many complements of the logo, thus my pushing for keeping it is some fashion. :-) ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | ||
[[Image:WikiIndexLogoIdeasOct2010.png|Right]] | |||
I find the logo great, but it could be even greater :-) though a need for a rebrand seems not to be. But think also about the favicon which is currently empty. Please let me have a further look on it. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 00:07, 27 October 2010 (PDT)<br/><small>@Raymond, was it your design?</small> | I find the logo great, but it could be even greater :-) though a need for a rebrand seems not to be. But think also about the favicon which is currently empty. Please let me have a further look on it. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 00:07, 27 October 2010 (PDT)<br/><small>@Raymond, was it your design?</small> | ||