WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path (view source)

Revision as of 05:18, 7 April 2011

2,925 bytes removed ,  7 April 2011
merging
(moved over here to work over)
 
(merging)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Upgrade===
==Upgrade==
I'd be happy to try to upgrade this MediaWiki and/or add extensions that we might need, but not sure what's needed and also not sure what customizations, etc. we've had that we'd have to keep in mind.  Any thoughts? [[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small>
* moved to [[WikiIndex:NewLogoDiscussion]]
* ''Oh, and yes, I know about the favicon and will fix as soon as possible ...''
* Update favicon
::One common extension we don't have is [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Renameuser Extension:Renameuser], which allows bureaucrats the ability to change the name of an account. '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''', 10 14 2010
* Extensions:
:: Also, how about Semantic MediaWiki
** [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Renameuser Extension:Renameuser]
::* Semantic Wiki (allows if statements which can help make better infoboxes and other stuff too)
** Semantic MediaWiki
: Making WikiIndex a semantic wiki with the extensions. - I like this, ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
*** [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms Semantic Forms]
: I would like to consider if we would like to move to a semantic MediaWiki - I am asking now if all that is, is the extension. This is an estimate I got from Yaron Koren of WikiWorks.com:
** CITE for references
 
** [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Check_Spambots Check Spambots]  
: Update of existing code: .5 hour
which is substantially easier than [[WikiIndex:Add_a_Wiki|the current system]]. Additionallly I see no reason why [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Drilldown Semantic Drilldown] should not be useful for users too. Just have a look at [http://discoursedb.org/wiki/Main_Page Discourse DB] to see an example. --[[User:Kghbln|kgh]] 08:19, 1 November 2010 (PDT)
: Updating site copy: 2 hours
: Installing SMW and related extensions: 1 hour
: Setting up wiki for SMW, including re-arranging category structure: 5 hours
 
What do folks think?  ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
::* CITE (allows easy creation of references)
::: I almost forgot about the cite extension, that's practically mandatory, and semantic would not be a bad idea either. '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''', 10 16 2010
:::: Nice but not mandatory in terms of [[DocumentingWikis]] as different than [[EmergentWikis]]. Best, [[MarkDilley]]
:::: So when do you think a possible upgrade might happen? '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''', 10 17 2010
::::: Can you think of anything else that we've customized or added that we should be careful of when we upgrade?  If not, then I'm ready to move forward with it.  Could you help me identify and ask any other admins?  [[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small>
: ''When [[John Stanton]] retired, I took notes about what files needed to be saved during an upgrade,  [[Raymond King]] - please talk with me before doing an upgrade.  Thanks, [[MarkDilley]]
:* The idea of installing Semantic MediaWiki greatly appeals to my inner geek, but I can't think of any specific uses for it right now. Then again, with the shiny new toy in front of me, that might change. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 03:37, 27 October 2010 (PDT)
:* Are there any downsides to installing SMW, apart from the workload? [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 03:37, 27 October 2010 (PDT)
:*I don't see the point of the Semantic Mediawiki upgrade. The question is, is that useful to the users of this Wiki? I can't say for certain that it is for everyone, for me personally it doesn't seem to be. I would be interested in the possibility of having stronger anti-spam support ((Like [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Check_Spambots Check Spambots] for example)) [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] 18:10, 27 October 2010 (PDT)
:: Semantic MediaWiki has one big advantage for this wiki: It allows structured an guided data entry through [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms Semantic Forms] which is substantially easier than [[WikiIndex:Add_a_Wiki|the current system]]. Additionallly I see no reason why [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Drilldown Semantic Drilldown] should not be useful for users too. Just have a look at [http://discoursedb.org/wiki/Main_Page Discourse DB] to see an example. --[[User:Kghbln|kgh]] 08:19, 1 November 2010 (PDT)


I second the suggestion of RenameUser. &mdash;&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Comic Sans MS;">[[User:Sean Fennel]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|@]]</span> 13:38, 31 October 2010 (PDT)
I second the suggestion of RenameUser. &mdash;&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Comic Sans MS;">[[User:Sean Fennel]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|@]]</span> 13:38, 31 October 2010 (PDT)
Line 55: Line 40:


: To me this sounds like a plan. Concerning DBA: If I get [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Cache this page] right it would be better to have APC rather than DBA. Cheers --[[User:Kghbln|kgh]] 12:26, 7 November 2010 (PST)
: To me this sounds like a plan. Concerning DBA: If I get [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Cache this page] right it would be better to have APC rather than DBA. Cheers --[[User:Kghbln|kgh]] 12:26, 7 November 2010 (PST)
moved to [[WikiIndex:NewLogoDiscussion]]
MarkDilley
Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160

edits

Retrieved from "https://wikiindex.org/w/Special:MobileDiff/82323"

Navigation menu