4,624
edits
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (→Do you like it raw?: added reply) |
(→Do you like it raw?: sometimes) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
: Raw is good for MediaWikis in rarely spoken languages i.e. Chinese, because raw is in "SimpleEnglish". --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 06:25, 21 December 2008 (EST) | : Raw is good for MediaWikis in rarely spoken languages i.e. Chinese, because raw is in "SimpleEnglish". --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 06:25, 21 December 2008 (EST) | ||
::Raw does <u>not</u> currently work on Wikia sites (it returns an unrecognised expression error message). And on non-Western language MediaWikis, raw does not always render numeric values in western digits - I end up looking up the data on the [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias#All_Wikipedias_ordered_by_number_of_articles meta table]. So my own personal experience is that raw is actually a detriment to the current template, and is currently serving no purpose! [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 01:57, 21 June 2011 (PDT) | ::Raw does <u>not</u> currently work on Wikia sites (it returns an unrecognised expression error message). And on non-Western language MediaWikis, raw does not always render numeric values in western digits - I end up looking up the data on the [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias#All_Wikipedias_ordered_by_number_of_articles meta table]. So my own personal experience is that raw is actually a detriment to the current template, and is currently serving no purpose! [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 01:57, 21 June 2011 (PDT) | ||
::: The use of the ''raw'' version was only a suggestion and is not planned to be integrated here (as far as I know). So it can be decided on a case by case basis. Best --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 02:13, 21 June 2011 (PDT) | |||
== parameters without underscores == | == parameters without underscores == | ||
edits