Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160
edits
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) m (→Deleting Wiki from WikiIndex: hate time date stamps) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (→Check this out: new section) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
: I don't think it really makes any sense to list sites that are long dead, especially if there is little or no information about the defunct wiki. [[EdBooks]] for example has been dead for at least 5 years, and the domain for [[Nepwiki]] seems to have never been registered. Is there any reason to keep these pages? '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''', 06 18 2011 | : I don't think it really makes any sense to list sites that are long dead, especially if there is little or no information about the defunct wiki. [[EdBooks]] for example has been dead for at least 5 years, and the domain for [[Nepwiki]] seems to have never been registered. Is there any reason to keep these pages? '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''', 06 18 2011 | ||
:: ''We have over 800 in the archive right now [[:Category:Inactive]]. It had been a decision at the outset to keep the pages of dead wiki for historical purposes. The question can be raised to folks to see if we should just delete them. I think that we have a unique position in the wiki world to show the projects that have failed. Am open to figuring out a new policy. But maybe till that is decided, keep them...? Best, [[MarkDilley]]'' | :: ''We have over 800 in the archive right now [[:Category:Inactive]]. It had been a decision at the outset to keep the pages of dead wiki for historical purposes. The question can be raised to folks to see if we should just delete them. I think that we have a unique position in the wiki world to show the projects that have failed. Am open to figuring out a new policy. But maybe till that is decided, keep them...? Best, [[MarkDilley]]'' | ||
== Check this out == | |||
I think this might have been something you were looking for? [[Form:Wiki]]. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||