User talk:Phantom Hoover: Difference between revisions
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
How do you feel about DavidCary proposal to adopt [[Wikipedia:Block#Protection Wikipedia's block policy]]? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | How do you feel about DavidCary proposal to adopt [[Wikipedia:Block#Protection Wikipedia's block policy]]? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
Is blocking even practical at all given your knowledge of the internets and associated technologies? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:49, 4 September 2009 (EDT) | Is blocking even practical at all given your ["]knowledge["] of the internets and associated technologies? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:49, 4 September 2009 (EDT) '''(I had to do a little update there. I added some brackets to my last post. Sorry if that confused anybody. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:14, 4 September 2009 (EDT))''' |
Revision as of 09:14, 4 September 2009
If you remove content again I'll block you. Proxima Centauri 15:14, 22 August 2009 (EDT)
- Shoo, and go back to pretending you have power on Liberapedia, rather than pimping it on sites which matter. Phantom Hoover 15:09, 23 August 2009 (EDT)
Hello, Phantom Hoover — Welcome to WikiIndex :-) |
WikiIndex aims to build bridges between wiki communities. We hope that you will enjoy browsing and editing this wiki.
Our goal is to make an index of all wiki sites. We appreciate your help in our ongoing quest.
Your contributions and your ideas are greatly valued. Thank you! |
Ignore the inhospitableness of Proxima Centauri, seeing as how she's running to other sysops for reassurance, I'm sure she can't do much. Nx 15:19, 23 August 2009 (EDT)
- Yaay! Where did she run for reassurance? Phantom Hoover 15:34, 23 August 2009 (EDT)
- Found it. Why do I feel that she comprises half the comments here? Phantom Hoover 15:37, 23 August 2009 (EDT)
It's bad enough that I have to edit from behind a proxy and fill out a captcha, don't make it worse by ec-ing me :P. 67.159.45.53 04:01, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
- Sorry. Phantom Hoover 04:01, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
Thanks
Thanks for adding the TFlp logo. (Thanks for your work on creating it as well.)--Bob M 03:04, 29 August 2009 (EDT)
"bring some sanity here"?
...strange kind of, so far... ;-) Best --Wolf | talk 06:23, 31 August 2009 (EDT)
Hiya old buddy
I think I've drop a few notches on the social ladder since you voted for me. :-) Lumenos 12:06, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
Now I feel that I have screwed up the RationalWiki talk page so I just thought I would acknowledge that since I noticed you were online (using certain patented Lumenati technology I am not at liberty to discuss). Lumenos 12:09, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- That patented Lumenati technology also allows a carefully crafted username to delete the entire contents of this wiki. Nx 12:55, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- Umm so how do we prevent that, Boss? Lumenos 13:55, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- Someone with server access removes the extension, for example. I don't like you knowing when I'm online anyway. Nx 13:56, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- OOOOOOh yeah I get it. So I run over to that bureaucrat and ask if he can remove the extension cause you said so then, its all a big hoax and you all snark snark about that while I look stupid. Nice try. Lumenos 14:04, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- Ok, then I'll just break every page that has the whosonline tag on it. Give me a second. Nx 14:06, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- Does this involve unescaped HTML in the usernames? Phantom Hoover 15:09, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- I'm not having any problem viewing my user page. It is nearing my bedtime. Can we do this in 8 hours or so? You guys probably know how long I sleep by now. I love everyone now. Let's build a campfire. Lumenos 15:50, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- Eh, I can delete the online table so that the extension only shows you as being online, and I could break into your account if mediawiki didn't turn underscores into spaces in usernames during account creation. Nx 03:26, 2 September 2009 (EDT)
- I consider these to be possibilities. Do you want to prove this to me or anyone else, without doing something anyone would be offended or detrimented by? Lumenos 04:48, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
- Eh, I can delete the online table so that the extension only shows you as being online, and I could break into your account if mediawiki didn't turn underscores into spaces in usernames during account creation. Nx 03:26, 2 September 2009 (EDT)
- Ok, then I'll just break every page that has the whosonline tag on it. Give me a second. Nx 14:06, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- OOOOOOh yeah I get it. So I run over to that bureaucrat and ask if he can remove the extension cause you said so then, its all a big hoax and you all snark snark about that while I look stupid. Nice try. Lumenos 14:04, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- Someone with server access removes the extension, for example. I don't like you knowing when I'm online anyway. Nx 13:56, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- Umm so how do we prevent that, Boss? Lumenos 13:55, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- That patented Lumenati technology also allows a carefully crafted username to delete the entire contents of this wiki. Nx 12:55, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- Oh I see now that you have already commented on my
talkpage. Lumenos 12:11, 1 September 2009 (EDT) Thank you for fixing my um Lumena... nevermind. uuh nobody has ever attempted electing me for president so I'm handling that the best I can. Lumenos 12:16, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
President
I do not wish to be president, thankyouverymuch. Nx 13:50, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- Fine. You can be Prime Minister. Phantom Hoover 15:05, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- Seconded. Huw Powell 02:29, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
- Okay, I'll be backup, if he doesn't want the "job" (it won't be a job when I'm done with it). Lumenos 05:10, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
- Seconded. Huw Powell 02:29, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
Deleting nearly everything from the Lumeniki article
16:45, 30 August 2009 Phantom Hoover (Talk | contribs) (1,102 bytes) (Prune. With a chainsaw)
- Thank you for expressing an interest in Lumeniki. This wiki clearly did not belong in "Category:Catholic" because that would just be confusing and disorderly for those searching here for their gosh. Lumenos 04:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
Helping develop policy
I wonder if you might help us develop some inclusion/exclusion policies. Perhaps you would be a good judge of what info is notable enough to include in a wiki article. Lumenos 04:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
What should constitute an offense worthy of a block? Lumenos 04:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
How do you feel about DavidCary proposal to adopt Wikipedia:Block#Protection Wikipedia's block policy? Lumenos 04:44, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
Is blocking even practical at all given your ["]knowledge["] of the internets and associated technologies? Lumenos 04:49, 4 September 2009 (EDT) (I had to do a little update there. I added some brackets to my last post. Sorry if that confused anybody. Lumenos 05:14, 4 September 2009 (EDT))