Welcome to WikiIndex — the 'wiki index' of all wikis, wiki people, wiki software, wiki farms, and wiki ideas.
Please add your wiki, and join our community. Note: WikiIndex is not a wiki hosting service.

(please log-in to bypass the anti-spam Captcha and remove this heading notice)

User talk:Rpeh: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "Talk Pages for Wiki People" to "Talk pages for wiki people")
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Welcome}}
{{Welcome}} --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] 15:05, 4 September 2009 (EDT)
--[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] 15:05, 4 September 2009 (EDT)


==You are still welcome==
==Hello==
Hi Rpeh. I hope you return to [[RationalWiki]] when it is back running. I know we didn't treat you very well and for anything I said to you, I'm sorry. I have been apologising to a few people I was snapping at around that time. Any way pop by and say hi to all down in the Saloon bar, you are always welcome. [[User talk:Pi|Pi]] 07:05, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
:Actually... confession time. I ''am'' back. I created a different account a few weeks after I left, because I decided it would be better to make a fresh start. I'll [[redirect]] the old [[user]] to the new one when RW comes back up, but in the meantime you can have fun guessing who it is. Not tricky though.
:I'm sorry for the silly things I said and I think we should all have a big group hug :) [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 07:10, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
::We all shall. I am probably about to get banned from here, so I'll see you back on RW. Peace. [[User talk:Pi|Pi]] 07:15, 6 September 2009 (EDT)


I was sorta "peeved" that you were unwilling to give me any "constructive" criticism, but I wish that you would still consider being an editor here and not regard the actions of one editor as reflecting WikiIndex as a whole. Particularly [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines|before any real rules have been established]]. Feel free to make your recommendations for any etiquette guide, guideline, or policy. (You may notice I'm not any real "authority" here, they are just giving everyone more freedom these days.) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:18, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
==Archiving to /dev/null==
: I've been an active editor of this wiki for quite some time, although I only just created an account. I fully intend to stay as an active user. I didn't post any "constructive" criticism of you because it's impossible to constructively criticise an internet troll. You are filling page after page with irrelevant nonsense, asking pointless questions that are nothing to do with you and prodding people for action they're not obliged to take. I see that Recent Changes is once more full of your edits, including trolling ones like [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User:Phantom_Hoover&curid=19066&diff=70598&oldid=70432 this] and [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Phantom_Hoover&curid=18985&diff=70607&oldid=70423 this]. Please stop wasting everybody's time. [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 02:47, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
I don't approve of it, but given how much of an idiot he was being, it's your call. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 13:44, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
::[[User_talk:Lumenos#wow|See but many others apparently don't agree with you, including members of the administration here and me fellow hobgoblins]]. How would you define a troll? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:25, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
:::Let me ask it this way. Do you think that in my perception, I am being disruptive? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:31, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
::Talk pages can be archived if they are irrelevant. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 04:31, 6 September 2009 (EDT)


== Hello ==
:I would normally not approve either. In this case I looked at the text in question, wondered who would miss it, concluded "nobody" and went ahead.
:To clarify: Article [[talk page]]s should never be purged except in extreme cases ([[spam]] / libel / bad pr0n etc).  [[WikiIndex:Talk pages for wiki people|User talk]] pages are, from my POV, simply a way of passing a message to a user or (in administrative cases) highlighting a fact about a [[user]] to the community. In other words, I wouldn't have deleted a useful conversation between users, and I wouldn't have deleted a comment or warning from the wiki staff. Deleting drivel designed to annoy, on the other hand, shouldn't be controversial, and any user should be allowed to delete such from their talk page. On that score, I disagreed with [https://WikiIndex.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Nx&curid=19002&diff=70699&oldid=70698 this] edit you made, but I'll leave that up to [[User:Nx|Nx]]. [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 13:53, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
::Fine. He insulted me too (How am I "gay for Nx"? We were both the voices of sanity here.) [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 13:57, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
:::Ooooh go on! You admire his sexy two-character username! :p [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 14:01, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
::::Heh. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 14:03, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
:::::(ecx2 AARGH) I'll leave his stupidity in the open for all to see. I expected Lumenos to reinstate that edit on my talk page with a snarky italicized comment accusing me of censorship, so the revert was more of a way for me to vent my frustrations, but PH got there first. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 14:03, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
::::::Oh don't bring that hideous thing back out here. Rpeh is the first one fearless enough to tuck away a lumenist talk page post. It must be because he has much better things to do. If you're not careful you'll be next. Now come back to [http://Lumeniki.Referata.com/wiki/Lumeneti#Lumeneti Lumeneti] where you are appreciated. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:57, 6 September 2009 (EDT)


Hi Rpeh. I hope you return to RationalWiki when it is back running. I know we didn't treat you very well and for anything I said to you, I'm sorry. I have been apologising to a few people I was snapping at around that time. Any way pop by and say hi to all down in the Saloon bar, you are always welcome. [[User:Pi|Pi]] 07:05, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
==Requesting your opinions on the policy proposal to relocate talk page comments==
: Actually... confession time. I ''am'' back. I created a different account a few weeks after I left, because I decided it would be better to make a fresh start. I'll redirect the old user to the new one when RW comes back up, but in the meantime you can have fun guessing who it is. Not tricky though.
Whoa man. There was no [[edit summary]] box and I got a little freaked out there trying to figure out if rpeh and the his Band of Merry Hackers, had it removed, or if it was all Dilley's idear. Alas, the truth is it doesn't appear when you click "new section". Harmony is again restored to the universe... but perhaps I shouldn't be the one writing all the polices here. So here is an invitation to <del>a slumber party</del> express your opinions on the matter of whether [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines#Enforcement against editors|hobgoblins should be able to post whatever they want on Dilley's talk page]]. I'm guessing you would be arguing that Dilley should be the one to do all the work of removing this crap. Perhaps he will agree, or perhaps he will not. Notice this comment of his, ''"[[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines#Your comments may be edited by others|My experience with wiki, is that if I say something that is outrageous and inflammatory - someone comes in and fixes it - keeps the meaning but neutralizes it. So I do agree with not creating an atmosphere of forest fire mentality or edit waring or flaming.]]"'' [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:56, 9 September 2009 (EDT)
: I'm sorry for the silly things I said and I think we should all have a big group hug :) [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]] 07:10, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
:I've updated the [[WikiIndex:Policies and Guidelines|opening paragraph of the "policy" page]]. It is relevant to this issue as well. I think you are going to have to do more than just label people [and delete comments], if you want to influence WikiIndex policy. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:58, 9 September 2009 (EDT) (Update [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:00, 9 September 2009 (EDT))

Latest revision as of 16:35, 29 May 2024

How many languages do you recognise? :-)
Hello, Rpeh — Welcome to WikiIndex :-)
WikiIndex aims to build bridges between wiki communities. We hope that you will enjoy browsing and editing this wiki.

Our goal is to make an index of all wiki sites. We appreciate your help in our ongoing quest.

Your contributions and your ideas are greatly valued. Thank you!

--Michaeldsuarez 15:05, 4 September 2009 (EDT)

Hello[edit]

Hi Rpeh. I hope you return to RationalWiki when it is back running. I know we didn't treat you very well and for anything I said to you, I'm sorry. I have been apologising to a few people I was snapping at around that time. Any way pop by and say hi to all down in the Saloon bar, you are always welcome. Pi 07:05, 6 September 2009 (EDT)

Actually... confession time. I am back. I created a different account a few weeks after I left, because I decided it would be better to make a fresh start. I'll redirect the old user to the new one when RW comes back up, but in the meantime you can have fun guessing who it is. Not tricky though.
I'm sorry for the silly things I said and I think we should all have a big group hug :) rpeh 07:10, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
We all shall. I am probably about to get banned from here, so I'll see you back on RW. Peace. Pi 07:15, 6 September 2009 (EDT)

Archiving to /dev/null[edit]

I don't approve of it, but given how much of an idiot he was being, it's your call. Phantom Hoover 13:44, 6 September 2009 (EDT)

I would normally not approve either. In this case I looked at the text in question, wondered who would miss it, concluded "nobody" and went ahead.
To clarify: Article talk pages should never be purged except in extreme cases (spam / libel / bad pr0n etc). User talk pages are, from my POV, simply a way of passing a message to a user or (in administrative cases) highlighting a fact about a user to the community. In other words, I wouldn't have deleted a useful conversation between users, and I wouldn't have deleted a comment or warning from the wiki staff. Deleting drivel designed to annoy, on the other hand, shouldn't be controversial, and any user should be allowed to delete such from their talk page. On that score, I disagreed with this edit you made, but I'll leave that up to Nx. rpeh 13:53, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
Fine. He insulted me too (How am I "gay for Nx"? We were both the voices of sanity here.) Phantom Hoover 13:57, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
Ooooh go on! You admire his sexy two-character username! :p rpeh 14:01, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
Heh. Phantom Hoover 14:03, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
(ecx2 AARGH) I'll leave his stupidity in the open for all to see. I expected Lumenos to reinstate that edit on my talk page with a snarky italicized comment accusing me of censorship, so the revert was more of a way for me to vent my frustrations, but PH got there first. Nx 14:03, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
Oh don't bring that hideous thing back out here. Rpeh is the first one fearless enough to tuck away a lumenist talk page post. It must be because he has much better things to do. If you're not careful you'll be next. Now come back to Lumeneti where you are appreciated. Lumenos 14:57, 6 September 2009 (EDT)

Requesting your opinions on the policy proposal to relocate talk page comments[edit]

Whoa man. There was no edit summary box and I got a little freaked out there trying to figure out if rpeh and the his Band of Merry Hackers, had it removed, or if it was all Dilley's idear. Alas, the truth is it doesn't appear when you click "new section". Harmony is again restored to the universe... but perhaps I shouldn't be the one writing all the polices here. So here is an invitation to a slumber party express your opinions on the matter of whether hobgoblins should be able to post whatever they want on Dilley's talk page. I'm guessing you would be arguing that Dilley should be the one to do all the work of removing this crap. Perhaps he will agree, or perhaps he will not. Notice this comment of his, "My experience with wiki, is that if I say something that is outrageous and inflammatory - someone comes in and fixes it - keeps the meaning but neutralizes it. So I do agree with not creating an atmosphere of forest fire mentality or edit waring or flaming." Lumenos 05:56, 9 September 2009 (EDT)

I've updated the opening paragraph of the "policy" page. It is relevant to this issue as well. I think you are going to have to do more than just label people [and delete comments], if you want to influence WikiIndex policy. Lumenos 07:58, 9 September 2009 (EDT) (Update Lumenos 08:00, 9 September 2009 (EDT))