Open politics (Openpolitics.ca): Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "MultiLicense" to "Multi-license")
m (Text replacement - "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike" to "Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike")
Line 22: Line 22:
* the [http://openpolitics.ca/issue/position/argument issue/position/argument] form itself
* the [http://openpolitics.ca/issue/position/argument issue/position/argument] form itself
* the [http://openpolitics.ca/all+issues an extensive list of issues with neutral names]
* the [http://openpolitics.ca/all+issues an extensive list of issues with neutral names]
* the [http://openpolitics.ca/terms+of+use terms of use] integrating {{tag|Wiki Creative Commons Attribution|Creative Commons Attribution}} (CC-BY) contribution from individual users and releasing joint works under {{tag|Wiki Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike|Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike}} (CC-BY-SA) and {{tag|Wiki Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike|Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike}} (CC-BY-NC-SA)
* the [http://openpolitics.ca/terms+of+use terms of use] integrating {{tag|Wiki Creative Commons Attribution|Creative Commons Attribution}} (CC-BY) contribution from individual users and releasing joint works under {{tag|Wiki Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike|Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike}} (CC-BY-SA) and {{tag|Wiki Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike|Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike}} (CC-BY-NC-SA)
* the [http://openpolitics.ca/naming+conventions extensive naming conventions] which maintain compatibility with [[Wikipedia]] and journalist usage, a subset of the [http://openpolitics.ca/ECG_naming_conventions extremely extensive ECG naming conventions list]
* the [http://openpolitics.ca/naming+conventions extensive naming conventions] which maintain compatibility with [[Wikipedia]] and journalist usage, a subset of the [http://openpolitics.ca/ECG_naming_conventions extremely extensive ECG naming conventions list]
* careful separation of roles of [http://openpolitics.ca/anonymous anonymous] users, [http://openpolitics.ca/registered registered] users, more [http://openpolitics.ca/senior+editor regular editors], trained [http://openpolitics.ca/senior+editor senior editors] and others with governance responsibilities;  while anonymous sources are treated just as in other journalism, their edits to some pages are subject to more verification
* careful separation of roles of [http://openpolitics.ca/anonymous anonymous] users, [http://openpolitics.ca/registered registered] users, more [http://openpolitics.ca/senior+editor regular editors], trained [http://openpolitics.ca/senior+editor senior editors] and others with governance responsibilities;  while anonymous sources are treated just as in other journalism, their edits to some pages are subject to more verification

Revision as of 13:23, 5 December 2022

OpenPoliticsWikiLogo.JPG
Open politics (Openpolitics.ca)
Recent changes • [No WikiNode] • About • [No Mobile URL]
Founded by:
Status: Active
Language: English
Edit mode: OpenEdit
Wiki engine: TikiWiki
Wiki license: Multi-license
Main topic: Politics
Wiki size: unknown size [No see stats]

Canadian politics and e-government in issue/position/argument form, a widely-used 'multiple point of view' (MPOV) format which allows positions of many parties and major groups to co-exist on the same page without overwriting or censoring each other. Similar to More Perfect and DKosopedia in the US, and uk.openingpolitics.org in the UK, OpenPolitics.ca set some methodological and terminology precedents other political wikis use:

Other properties of more interest to wiki developers and Web 2.0 gurus include:

Weaknesses include a lack of user pages (TikiWiki support for these is extremely poor), no effective social features, and infrequent updates to the main page. The project has been seemingly neglected for long periods leaving some pages to fall out of date, and there has been active effort to revisit and update pages, even those marked clearly with "as of" tags. There is effectively no use of categories despite the extensive proposal for this.