Page history
12 September 2010
8 July 2010
16 May 2010
→Similar wikis: Category:GreatFeature
m+28
→RationalWiki today: great features (contains semicolon)
+243
15 May 2010
2 May 2010
23 April 2010
17 April 2010
1 March 2010
17 January 2010
15 January 2010
17 December 2009
4 December 2009
30 October 2009
19 October 2009
15 October 2009
14 October 2009
There is not currently an inclusion policy at WikiIndex; there is only an etiquette policy suggesting we not delete the work of others.
+314
→Criticism: Debate is over, no consensus reached.
−191
Labeled debated criticism and put in criticism section. Removed hidden comments and category links from "Similar wikis" section.
−758
9 October 2009
2 October 2009
24 September 2009
→Criticism preferred by RationalWiki bureaucrats: TALKPAGE!
−38
The last edit I changed what Hoovie calls "Criticism and rebuttals" to "Criticism preferred by RationalWiki bureaucrats". Adding "Debated criticism" section with link to debate on talk page.
+186
→Criticism and rebuttals
+24
You were beaten in that debate. When you anwer Huw we can move on
−557
I guess the anonymous editor is gone. Restoring original criticism because it is more brief and tidy. You have a number of rational arguments to deal with there on the talk page, Hooves.
+557
23 September 2009
I agree. "Unsubstatiated and biased" is indeed a good summary of your position in this
−1,683
no edit summary
+61
undid last edit by Phantom Hoover, unsubstantiated and biased
+840
Undid revision 71909 by Lumenos (talk): rm biased idiocy
−840
→Criticism: Someone likes that term "random", but it has no meaning here. Made section into a criticism and rebuttals style with last edit as a rebuttal with rebuttal to that. Nothing was deleted.
+840
22 September 2009
→Criticism
+225
→Criticism: worded better
−44
Hooves attacks again; making his own rules for WikiIndex. I rewrote the criticism in a clearer manner, hopefully.
+615
→Criticism: Go away
−250
21 September 2009
20 September 2009
→Criticism: removing ridiculous assertions
−104
→Criticism: I don't know how those stats got replaced. I apologize if that was my fault and no one is hacking the WikiIndex server, for example. Added my signature and clarified quote.
+246
→Criticism: perhaps this should have an attribution
+24
→Criticism: We need to know why he is of inerest
+29
19 September 2009
Undid revision 71741 by Lumenos (talk) reinstating whine about WP, you also backdated all the stats
+141
Replaced controversial content. There is a policy now, written by a real administrator. It states that 'controversial' and 'irrelevant' content should not be deleted, but instead debated on talk pages
+90
no edit summary
→Criticism: rm further idiocy
−60
→Criticism: rm idiocy
−684
→Criticism: link to notability of critical reviews
+88
moved a Creationism tag into the article body, added criticism category to similar wikis
−2
→Criticism: recrufted with umm extra accuracies
+444