Page history
29 May 2024
11 January 2023
30 September 2022
3 August 2021
13 June 2021
19 September 2018
9 June 2018
23 January 2018
9 January 2018
6 January 2018
2 May 2017
29 January 2017
28 July 2014
12 September 2011
20 June 2011
8 November 2010
7 October 2009
6 October 2009
minor copyedit
+5
This looks to me like the most sensible version - ''please'' use the talk page to discuss changes rather than piling up quoted stuff on the project page
−13,408
5 October 2009
→Criticism of wikis: moved Cary's comment up, because it does not actually suggest that criticism may be allowable
m+6
no edit summary
m+1
added many comments, edited Felix' writing in the intro and another section (indicated this with signature in brackets)
+3,296
→Sources of inspiration
+278
4 October 2009
24 September 2009
21 September 2009
Felix comment on biographical info
+662
→Point of view, commenting in articles
m+2
reposting many comments from the administration (without most of my comments, questions, observations, and outline structure), re-added categories,
+7,876
18 September 2009
17 September 2009
14 September 2009
Replaced page with Bob's suggestion, based on Dilley's comment here.
−43,499
→Common sense proposal: common sense to prevention too.
+258
→This page will likely be copied to [[Lumeniki]]: section not needed
−809
→Administrative powers
+500
13 September 2009
→Administrative powers: Move to article page when agreed upon by 3 Sysops and 3 people involved in the conflict]". When ''what'' is agreed upon? The only people I've come across, who seem to possi
+1,129
no edit summary
m−6
→Administrative powers: I propose that the administration '''not''' protect articles, simply because there is "edit warring" over them, unless someone requests protection. If an administrator pers
+198
→Editor's powers: * '''Request administrative action:''' Request one of the following administrative actions listed under "Administrative powers".
+114
→Administrative powers: * '''Oversite:''' I believe this means removing something from edit histories, logs, etc.
+51
→Administrative powers: * Relocating an article about a wiki, to the talk page, and locking the article: I propose that this not be done unless someone involved in the conflict, requests it.
+146
→Common sense proposal: The Man is totally screwing with my edits
m−8
→Common sense proposal
+132
12 September 2009
→Administrative powers
m+1
→Your comments may be edited by others: bolding Dilley's comments
+24
The rest of the "policies" don't exist (or they are unwritten) aside from "spam". This seemed to be a source of confusion and conflict so I (Lumenos) made most of this article (with out asking anybody
+232
→Editor's powers: *'''Ridicule:''' IMO a fairly standard practice of the RationalWiki mafia (myself included). Try to use for the betterment of WikiIndex and the world, if possible. ~~~~
+224
→Common sense proposal: Phantom Hoover's [and Nx's] edits are also at least as noteworthy as any of mine.
+55
→Editor's powers
−21
→Administrative powers
m−184