Page history
5 May 2013
4 May 2013
== Technology via the community == This isn't the right section title, but what I am trying to get across is - what technology does the community a) need to have access to, to make WikiIndex even better. b) who here has skills / time / interest to
+281
→Bugs: ### Do we know what might be the issue here with the email issue?
+68
→Account creation protection: ### Please say more Elassint - is it not a worry to have spam accounts sitting in the database? Best, ~~~
+122
→Images
m+1
→Images: cleaned up the favicon discussion - just to push forward for the WI - which is awesome
−1,037
→MediaWiki version: hmmm, or 1.19 branch, not as clear as what we should do.
+6
→MediaWiki version: reply
+187
→MediaWiki version: Good question in need of a good answer! What, specifically does the 1.20 branch offer over and above the 1.19 branch?
+330
→Bugs: fix format
+2
→Bugs: format
m−4
→General housekeeping: reply
+164
→MediaWiki version: forgot to sig
m+87
Reply
+165
3 May 2013
→Account creation protection: aw
+342
→General housekeeping: aw
+636
→LinkSpam / WikiSpam / Vandalism: aw
+426
→MediaWiki version: aw
+231
→Images: aw
+554
→Account creation protection
+219
→LinkSpam / WikiSpam / Vandalism
+379
2 May 2013
→MediaWiki version: ::::::::::: Thanks for checking into that Jack - it seems like that would be pretty helpful for lots of wiki communities! Best, ~~~
+147
+comments -- upgrading from a minor version to a different, newer minor version is not problematic and can be done right away as time permits "that someone" to do so
+1,005
1 May 2013
→MediaWiki version
+33
→MediaWiki version: reply
+356
→MediaWiki version: my response, sorry for the huge wall of text
+1,256
→MediaWiki version: ::::::: Arcane, do you think it is ok to just test out 1.20.5? (if that is what you are suggesting? and test it out with WikiIndex data? sorry, not so knowledgable!!) Best, ~~~
+192
30 April 2013
→MediaWiki version: new security patches for MediaWiki released
+687
response
+127
→Account creation protection: answering Mark Dilley's question about User Merge And Delete
+300
→Account creation protection: so basically you are saying we could clean up the spam accounts by deleting the one at a time? ~~ ~~~
+116
→Account creation protection
+406
→LinkSpam / WikiSpam / Vandalism: fix typeo
m−1
→General housekeeping
m+1
→General housekeeping
+495
::::: Jack, is their a way to have control put into our hands to add questions or change them when needed? Best, ~~~
+133
29 April 2013
there are various definitions of "working", but if by it we mean "it's not horribly broken and not actively imparing normal site operation", then I guess you could say that the CAPTCHA system is working
+347
→MediaWiki version: cmt
+222
28 April 2013
→General housekeeping
m−15
→General housekeeping: strike server intensive extension
+7
→General housekeeping: remove my Con, as it was ridiculous - looked at extension and like it
−164
→General housekeeping: agree with Sean - strike for now - as with any of these, if you have different idea, please BeBold
+7
→Account creation protection: strike out
+7
→LinkSpam / WikiSpam / Vandalism: moved into need
→MediaWiki version: update as per Jack
−11
+some comments
+3,227
→General housekeeping: so cross out
m+7