Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,132
edits
WikiIndex:Community portal/News: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
sub headers added, better than just bold?
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (move IncludeOnly) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (sub headers added, better than just bold?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
; < [[Community Portal]] | ; < [[Community Portal]] | ||
<onlyinclude> | <onlyinclude> | ||
=== 27 May 2013 === | |||
[[MetaWiki]] is organizing information in a really interesting way, both from an information architecture and design view. [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News/2013/22]. Impressed, [[MarkDilley]] | [[MetaWiki]] is organizing information in a really interesting way, both from an information architecture and design view. [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News/2013/22]. Impressed, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
</onlyinclude> | </onlyinclude> | ||
=== April 2012 === | |||
I have unified [[Form:Wiki]] and [[Template:Wiki]], so now, when you click on "edit with form", the form is autofilled. | I have unified [[Form:Wiki]] and [[Template:Wiki]], so now, when you click on "edit with form", the form is autofilled. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Edit with form seems to remove editmode line from infobox. Is that intentional? --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] ([[User talk:EarthFurst|talk]]) 02:01, 14 August 2012 (PDT) | Edit with form seems to remove editmode line from infobox. Is that intentional? --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] ([[User talk:EarthFurst|talk]]) 02:01, 14 August 2012 (PDT) | ||
=== January 2012 === | |||
Spam fighting, less spam fighting but it is still here with account spam. [[Ray King]] raised the question with me of requiring accounts to be authorized as a way to try and cut spam down to zero. We both loathe this option... but... we wanted to put it out to folks, especially the heros of spam fighting on [[WikiIndex]] - to see what you thought about it. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | Spam fighting, less spam fighting but it is still here with account spam. [[Ray King]] raised the question with me of requiring accounts to be authorized as a way to try and cut spam down to zero. We both loathe this option... but... we wanted to put it out to folks, especially the heros of spam fighting on [[WikiIndex]] - to see what you thought about it. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
::It's nowhere as bad as it once was, so for the moment, I don't think it's necessary. The anon edits were the real pain and they are mostly gone now, so I think that going to a account authorization system would place more of a load on the Admin I think at least. [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] | ::It's nowhere as bad as it once was, so for the moment, I don't think it's necessary. The anon edits were the real pain and they are mostly gone now, so I think that going to a account authorization system would place more of a load on the Admin I think at least. [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] | ||