WikiIndex:Community portal/News: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
smaller sub headers
(sub headers added, better than just bold?)
(smaller sub headers)
Line 1: Line 1:
; < [[Community Portal]]
; < [[Community Portal]]
<onlyinclude>
<onlyinclude>
=== 27 May 2013 ===
==== 27 May 2013 ====
[[MetaWiki]] is organizing information in a really interesting way, both from an information architecture and design view. [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News/2013/22]. Impressed, [[MarkDilley]]
[[MetaWiki]] is organizing information in a really interesting way, both from an information architecture and design view. [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News/2013/22]. Impressed, [[MarkDilley]]


; 20 May 2013:
==== 20 May 2013 ====
Edits made after around 2 AM UTC were lost today - [[Emufarmers]] has [[Upgraded]] software and extensions, still has a few to install, if he decides to.  Bug reports need more detail. ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
Edits made after around 2 AM UTC were lost today - [[Emufarmers]] has [[Upgraded]] software and extensions, still has a few to install, if he decides to.  Bug reports need more detail. ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
</onlyinclude>
</onlyinclude>


=== April 2012 ===
==== April 2012 ====
I have unified [[Form:Wiki]] and [[Template:Wiki]], so now, when you click on "edit with form", the form is autofilled.
I have unified [[Form:Wiki]] and [[Template:Wiki]], so now, when you click on "edit with form", the form is autofilled.


Line 24: Line 24:
Edit with form seems to remove editmode line from infobox. Is that intentional? --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] ([[User talk:EarthFurst|talk]]) 02:01, 14 August 2012 (PDT)
Edit with form seems to remove editmode line from infobox. Is that intentional? --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] ([[User talk:EarthFurst|talk]]) 02:01, 14 August 2012 (PDT)


=== January 2012 ===
==== January 2012 ====
Spam fighting, less spam fighting but it is still here with account spam.  [[Ray King]] raised the question with me of requiring accounts to be authorized as a way to try and cut spam down to zero.  We both loathe this option... but...  we wanted to put it out to folks, especially the heros of spam fighting on [[WikiIndex]] - to see what you thought about it.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
Spam fighting, less spam fighting but it is still here with account spam.  [[Ray King]] raised the question with me of requiring accounts to be authorized as a way to try and cut spam down to zero.  We both loathe this option... but...  we wanted to put it out to folks, especially the heros of spam fighting on [[WikiIndex]] - to see what you thought about it.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
::It's nowhere as bad as it once was, so for the moment, I don't think it's necessary. The anon edits were the real pain and they are mostly gone now, so I think that going to a account authorization system would place more of a load on the Admin I think at least. [[User:TeraS|TeraS]]
::It's nowhere as bad as it once was, so for the moment, I don't think it's necessary. The anon edits were the real pain and they are mostly gone now, so I think that going to a account authorization system would place more of a load on the Admin I think at least. [[User:TeraS|TeraS]]
Line 58: Line 58:
* Random Include
* Random Include
* Thumbnail
* Thumbnail
::[[User:John Stanton|John]] 21:18, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
:: [[User:John Stanton|John]] 21:18, 3 May 2008 (EDT)


<big>''To avoid the Captcha, [[Help:Login / create account|Login]]!'' and Confirm via Email</big>  [[User:John Stanton|John]] 18:24, 20 November 2007 (EST)
<big>''To avoid the Captcha, [[Help:Login / create account|Login]]!'' and Confirm via Email</big>  [[User:John Stanton|John]] 18:24, 20 November 2007 (EST)
Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,149

edits

Navigation menu