1,756
edits
Category talk:Wiki people: Difference between revisions
→Norms: re
(→Norms) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→Norms: re) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:: User Leucosticte added the sentence "This is a list of people who consider themselves to be part of the wiki community and their associations to various Wiki sites. Articles about wiki people should describe the person from a sympathetic point of view (in other words, focus on their positive attributes). Please add your name to this list by creating a new page for yourself." too that page a while ago. He is playing with ya all.--[[Special:Contributions/77.109.141.138|77.109.141.138]] 23:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | :: User Leucosticte added the sentence "This is a list of people who consider themselves to be part of the wiki community and their associations to various Wiki sites. Articles about wiki people should describe the person from a sympathetic point of view (in other words, focus on their positive attributes). Please add your name to this list by creating a new page for yourself." too that page a while ago. He is playing with ya all.--[[Special:Contributions/77.109.141.138|77.109.141.138]] 23:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::Ah, so it is. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] ([[User talk:MarvelZuvembie|talk]]) 23:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | :::Ah, so it is. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] ([[User talk:MarvelZuvembie|talk]]) 23:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::Well, I added that text because based on the recent deletion of [[Research Psychologist]], it seemed to be an accurate description of the norm. But that was a short article, about one paragraph, that mentioned mostly the controversies about him; I was wondering, if we had a longer article about someone, whether it would be appropriate to have a brief mention of controversies. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 11:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | |||