1,756
edits
Category talk:Wiki people: Difference between revisions
→Norms
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→Norms: re) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→Norms) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:: User Leucosticte added the sentence "This is a list of people who consider themselves to be part of the wiki community and their associations to various Wiki sites. Articles about wiki people should describe the person from a sympathetic point of view (in other words, focus on their positive attributes). Please add your name to this list by creating a new page for yourself." too that page a while ago. He is playing with ya all.--[[Special:Contributions/77.109.141.138|77.109.141.138]] 23:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | :: User Leucosticte added the sentence "This is a list of people who consider themselves to be part of the wiki community and their associations to various Wiki sites. Articles about wiki people should describe the person from a sympathetic point of view (in other words, focus on their positive attributes). Please add your name to this list by creating a new page for yourself." too that page a while ago. He is playing with ya all.--[[Special:Contributions/77.109.141.138|77.109.141.138]] 23:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::Ah, so it is. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] ([[User talk:MarvelZuvembie|talk]]) 23:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | :::Ah, so it is. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] ([[User talk:MarvelZuvembie|talk]]) 23:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::Well, I added that text because based on the recent deletion of [[Research Psychologist]], it seemed to be an accurate description of the norm. But that was a short article, about one paragraph, that mentioned mostly the controversies about him; I was wondering, if we had a longer article about someone, whether it would be appropriate to have a brief mention of controversies. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 11:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | ::::Well, I added that text because based on the recent deletion of [[Research Psychologist]], it seemed to be an accurate description of the norm. But that was a short article, about one paragraph, that mentioned mostly the controversies about him; I was wondering, if we had a longer article about someone, whether it would be appropriate to have a brief mention of controversies. If we went to minimize drama, we'll avoid saying anything negative about anyone, but then we'll be potentially depriving readers of information they might want to know. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 11:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | ||