1,756
edits
Template talk:RationalWiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Leftism: new section
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (re) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→Leftism: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think this template is necessary, alternative language versions of RationalWiki should be in the native language of the article. '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''' 7 March 2014 | I don't think this template is necessary, alternative language versions of RationalWiki should be in the native language of the article. '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''' 7 March 2014 | ||
:Sounds like a good idea, in theory; I think the idea behind the template was that people wouldn't bother to maintain some of the different language pages. However, if people are going to maintain them, then it's beneficial to let the content of the pages diverge, given the differences among the different language wikis. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 00:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | :Sounds like a good idea, in theory; I think the idea behind the template was that people wouldn't bother to maintain some of the different language pages. However, if people are going to maintain them, then it's beneficial to let the content of the pages diverge, given the differences among the different language wikis. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 00:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Leftism == | |||
With regard to [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Template%3ARationalWiki&diff=186624&oldid=186622 this edit], RW is definitely leftist. No less an authority than ED says, "they spend all day being angry and find the best use of their time is to create barely comprehensible, raging anti-Conservative/Religion manifestos in the guise of wiki articles", "Criticizing Conservative Christian sites is one of the RationalWiki users' favorite pastimes", "RationalWiki can also be quite heavy-handed in opposing what it considers to be "authoritarianism", which is the quality they apply to American conservatism. Although conservatives seek to shrink the size of the government and the amount of money people are forced to pay into it, RationalWiki users somehow believe that conservatives are seeking to have the government control everything". Metapedia says "The first members of the website were leftist editors that trolled on Conservapedia" and "You only have to click on the peoples userpages who edited the entry entitled 'racial realism' at Rationalwiki to see Liberal, or other left-wing political stances listed in userboxes." LessWrong [http://lesswrong.com/lw/f5b/the_problem_with_rational_wiki/ says] "Basically the material presented is what a slightly left of centre atheist needs to win an internet debate." | |||
RationalBlogs [http://rationalblogs.org/rationalwiki/2013/05/21/rationalwiki-and-liberalism/ says], "One only needs to make a casual trawl through some BoN (bunch-of-numbers, aka, anonymous IP edits) to the wiki, or the occasional randomer coming into the Facebook group, or any of the myriad comments on external sites to come to a simple conclusion: RationalWiki gets a ton of flak for being outstandingly liberal. There are then a few questions we can ask. The trivial: Is this even true? The interesting: Why is this the case? And the difficult: Is it a justifiable position? The first question is almost certainly 'yes'. Subjects such as abortion, universal healthcare and separation of church and state get pretty liberal treatments (or, as we might prefer to say, don’t suffer right-wing distortions) in their respective articles. The editorship is also largely liberal leaning in the behind-the-scenes discussions." | |||
Since they're anti-conservative, they must be libertarian, centrist, or leftist. Would anyone care to argue that they're libertarian or centrist? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 21:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC) | |||