331
edits
Template talk:RationalWiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Leftism
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→Leftism: new section) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Since they're anti-conservative, they must be libertarian, centrist, or leftist. Would anyone care to argue that they're libertarian or centrist? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 21:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC) | Since they're anti-conservative, they must be libertarian, centrist, or leftist. Would anyone care to argue that they're libertarian or centrist? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 21:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
It is not the job of WikiIndex to judge their politics. But, yes, '''I disagree with the rigid classification of RationalWiki, and human beings in general, into being only "conservative, libertarian, centrist, or leftist."''' There is much in the listing, placed there by Leucosticte, who was banned from RationalWiki. It's his opinion, but it is not attributed. I'm politically "progressive," with some libertarian positions, which is a fairly common position. I would be offended at being called "leftist." RationalWiki tends to be atheist, pro-"science" even when common scientific positions are not leftist, and most of all, it tends to be adolescent, with gross humor and the kind of flaming common among smart adolescents. | |||
Leucosticte should not be editing that listing with anything smelling of bias. They don't call themselves "leftist," and, above, Leucosticte seems to be claiming that it must be "leftist" because it gets "flak for being outstandingly liberal." They are not liberal, as I'd use the word. However, it's a wiki. I edit it once in a while, I'm not banned, and I have sysop tools there. Mostly, it's not worth it, like a lot of wikis, it's pushing a boulder up the mountain, with cliques and the usual: wiki users who do not want to take any time to research a subject, but just want to say something funny or witty or what they imagine is so. They would definitely make a judgment like this about another wiki. WikiIndex, my opinion, should resist this kind of abuse. Sites should be listed by site owners as how they would like to be described. If something more is needed, to prevent harm, that can be added. | |||
RationalWiki is easily described as anti-Conservative, being founded for refugees from Conservapdia. Conservapedia is a major focus of derision for RationalWikians. | |||
Lecuosticte reverted, I'm reverting back, and will probably take more out.. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 02:11, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | |||