User talk:JenniferForUnity: Difference between revisions

opinion about redlink categories
(opinion about redlink categories)
Line 25: Line 25:


Sounds like these sites need to be on the [[ChicagoCo-op]] WikiNode (except we don't have one yet)!  I live in a housing co-op in Chicago and started that wiki.  I haven't put any energy into it, however, so it's not really going anywhere yet. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:04, 19 October 2006 (EDT)
Sounds like these sites need to be on the [[ChicagoCo-op]] WikiNode (except we don't have one yet)!  I live in a housing co-op in Chicago and started that wiki.  I haven't put any energy into it, however, so it's not really going anywhere yet. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:04, 19 October 2006 (EDT)
== opinion about redlink categories ==
Jennifer, really glad to see you back!  Excellent work on the category system (again)!  Just wanted to let you know my opinion about redlink categories.  The way I see it, they're not broken, they're future links.  I totally agree with you about vanity categories and at the same time, the only reliable way we'll know if there are 3 wikis in a same neighborhood in NYC is to let them each tag as a neighborhood and have those tags be redlinks until we know there are three.  Feel free to move this comment elsewhere if you can think of a more suitable location, in case others also want to comment.  I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.  Thanks!  [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:17, 31 October 2006 (EST)
6,456

edits