User talk:JenniferForUnity: Difference between revisions

Line 29: Line 29:


Jennifer, really glad to see you back!  Excellent work on the category system (again)!  Just wanted to let you know my opinion about redlink categories.  The way I see it, they're not broken, they're future links.  I totally agree with you about vanity categories and at the same time, the only reliable way we'll know if there are 3 wikis in a same neighborhood in NYC is to let them each tag as a neighborhood and have those tags be redlinks until we know there are three.  Feel free to move this comment elsewhere if you can think of a more suitable location, in case others also want to comment.  I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.  Thanks!  [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:17, 31 October 2006 (EST)
Jennifer, really glad to see you back!  Excellent work on the category system (again)!  Just wanted to let you know my opinion about redlink categories.  The way I see it, they're not broken, they're future links.  I totally agree with you about vanity categories and at the same time, the only reliable way we'll know if there are 3 wikis in a same neighborhood in NYC is to let them each tag as a neighborhood and have those tags be redlinks until we know there are three.  Feel free to move this comment elsewhere if you can think of a more suitable location, in case others also want to comment.  I'd love to hear your thoughts on this.  Thanks!  [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:17, 31 October 2006 (EST)
: Just to throw my two cents in. Dangling links / red links / future links, are extremely important because they invite future people to the wiki to participate. Best, [[MarkDilley]]


== Wiki Lists ==
== Wiki Lists ==
Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160

edits