Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  23 November 2008
→‎Go ahead, keep deleting the "Criticism" section.: ok, reareading, not all of them are that bad
(→‎Go ahead, keep deleting the "Criticism" section.: ok, reareading, not all of them are that bad)
Line 75: Line 75:


I have made a more conservapedia-friendly article, please do not attack external links that are not neutral at all.[[User:Eros of Fire|Eros of Fire]] 17:38, 23 November 2008 (EST)
I have made a more conservapedia-friendly article, please do not attack external links that are not neutral at all.[[User:Eros of Fire|Eros of Fire]] 17:38, 23 November 2008 (EST)
:Check out the convo [[Category_talk:Active_administrators_of_this_wiki#Conservapedia.2C_RationalWiki_etc|here]]. I'm fine with taking out the links (if that is the final comprimise), but I don't agree to most of your other changes. For example, you added that users were blocked for adding "non-christian information"; not only is this not really true, but it's more of a criticism than a compliment, when is what I assume you were going for. Also, conservatives ''do'' criticize CP, so I don't know why you keep removing that. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 18:35, 23 November 2008 (EST)
:Check out the convo [[Category_talk:Active_administrators_of_this_wiki#Conservapedia.2C_RationalWiki_etc|here]]. I'm fine with taking out the links (if that is the final comprimise), but I don't agree to many of your other changes. For example, you added that users were blocked for adding "non-christian information"; not only is this not really true, but it's more of a criticism than a compliment, when is what I assume you were going for. Also, conservatives ''do'' criticize CP, so I don't know why you keep removing that. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 18:35, 23 November 2008 (EST)
54

edits

Navigation menu