Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,308 bytes added ,  24 November 2008
Wikiindex
(→‎Go ahead, keep deleting the "Criticism" section.: ok, reareading, not all of them are that bad)
(Wikiindex)
Line 76: Line 76:
I have made a more conservapedia-friendly article, please do not attack external links that are not neutral at all.[[User:Eros of Fire|Eros of Fire]] 17:38, 23 November 2008 (EST)
I have made a more conservapedia-friendly article, please do not attack external links that are not neutral at all.[[User:Eros of Fire|Eros of Fire]] 17:38, 23 November 2008 (EST)
:Check out the convo [[Category_talk:Active_administrators_of_this_wiki#Conservapedia.2C_RationalWiki_etc|here]]. I'm fine with taking out the links (if that is the final comprimise), but I don't agree to many of your other changes. For example, you added that users were blocked for adding "non-christian information"; not only is this not really true, but it's more of a criticism than a compliment, when is what I assume you were going for. Also, conservatives ''do'' criticize CP, so I don't know why you keep removing that. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 18:35, 23 November 2008 (EST)
:Check out the convo [[Category_talk:Active_administrators_of_this_wiki#Conservapedia.2C_RationalWiki_etc|here]]. I'm fine with taking out the links (if that is the final comprimise), but I don't agree to many of your other changes. For example, you added that users were blocked for adding "non-christian information"; not only is this not really true, but it's more of a criticism than a compliment, when is what I assume you were going for. Also, conservatives ''do'' criticize CP, so I don't know why you keep removing that. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 18:35, 23 November 2008 (EST)
== Wikiindex ==
I have been asked[http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADavidCary&diff=59927&oldid=59646] how much criticism is appropriate in the this Conservapedia article.
May I remind everyone that you are now reading a page on the [[WikiIndex]]?
I believe that everything is on-topic somewhere[http://www.communitywiki.org/en/OnAndOffTopic].
However, that does not mean that everything is on-topic here at WikiIndex.
The WikiIndex page "The Conservapedia RationalWiki war" has been deleted because as far as I can tell
(a) a better place for that content is at http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Essay:The_Conservapedia_RationalWiki_War , and
(b) that war is not a wiki, and therefore off-topic for WikiIndex.
Given that there is an entire wiki dedicated to criticizing Conservapedia, I fail to see why that criticism needs to be re-iterated here at WikiIndex.
And so I fail to understand why this WikiIndex page needs a criticism section.
Nevertheless, mentioning closely-related wiki is helpful for our target audience, and so I find the bullet point
*[[RationalWiki]], an '''entire wiki''' originally founded to criticize Conservapedia
entirely appropriate in this article.
Is it obvious to everyone that I am strongly biased?
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 09:23, 24 November 2008 (EST)

Navigation menu