211
edits
Category talk:Wikia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Reply to 'Criticism'
(WikiNode deleted) |
(Reply to 'Criticism') |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
This article has information about Wikia. A great deal is critical but there is favourable material as well. Wikia itself tells users what is good about their site. Users should know both sides in my opinion. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 04:53, 18 February 2009 (EST) | This article has information about Wikia. A great deal is critical but there is favourable material as well. Wikia itself tells users what is good about their site. Users should know both sides in my opinion. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 04:53, 18 February 2009 (EST) | ||
:Hmm. Is WikiIndex here to '''list''' wikis or to '''review''' them? If information about Wikia's flaws is put up (and I'm not necessarily saying it shouldn't) does that mean that problems with other wiki farms should be listed? Does that mean that problems with all wikis should be listed? Is criticism actually useful? Should WikiIndex have a "no original criticism" rule, that requires criticism to be citated back to an external source? | |||
:BTW: You might be interested to know that a user called CatherineMunro edited this page. There is a CatherineMunro over at Wikia. I personally find her very helpful, and (if this CatherineMunro is the Wikia one) she doesn't seem to have removed any criticism, but it has been snipped a bit. (Mostly the cruft about Wikia being like "New Coke" - which is meaningless to non-Americans anyway - has been cut.) [[User:David Shepheard|David Shepheard]] 21:14, 23 April 2009 (EDT) | |||
== WikiNode deleted == | == WikiNode deleted == | ||