User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions

User talk:MarkDilley (edit)

641 bytes added , 7 May 2009

5,637

edits

Revision as of 17:48, 1 May 2009 (edit) MarvelZuvembie (talk \| contribs) (→‎Dicuss, warn, or block?: Discuss) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:51, 7 May 2009 (edit) (undo) MarvelZuvembie (talk \| contribs) (→‎Dicuss, warn, or block?: Reply) Newer edit →
Line 1,281:		Line 1,281:

	:Update: I've opted for "discuss". --[[User:MarvelZuvembie\|MarvelZuvembie]] 13:48, 1 May 2009 (EDT)		:Update: I've opted for "discuss". --[[User:MarvelZuvembie\|MarvelZuvembie]] 13:48, 1 May 2009 (EDT)

			::Thanks for getting back to me, Mark. I agree that we could review wikis (and of course there's always some subjectivity in deciding a wiki's status and in how to describe a wiki's content). I think it could add to the usefulness of the site. However, it wasn't how I perceived the site's mission as it stands right now. And if when we do review wikis, I hope it's something a bit more informative than "this wiki sux", which is approximately the level of usefulness that I see this particular user's comments as being. Please let me know if I get too far off base, though. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie\|MarvelZuvembie]] 12:51, 7 May 2009 (EDT)