211
edits
User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Comments added to 'Dicuss, warn, or block?'
(→Dicuss, warn, or block?: Reply) |
(Comments added to 'Dicuss, warn, or block?') |
||
| Line 1,283: | Line 1,283: | ||
::Thanks for getting back to me, Mark. I agree that we could review wikis (and of course there's always some subjectivity in deciding a wiki's status and in how to describe a wiki's content). I think it could add to the usefulness of the site. However, it wasn't how I perceived the site's mission as it stands right now. And if when we do review wikis, I hope it's something a bit more informative than "this wiki sux", which is approximately the level of usefulness that I see this particular user's comments as being. Please let me know if I get too far off base, though. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 12:51, 7 May 2009 (EDT) | ::Thanks for getting back to me, Mark. I agree that we could review wikis (and of course there's always some subjectivity in deciding a wiki's status and in how to describe a wiki's content). I think it could add to the usefulness of the site. However, it wasn't how I perceived the site's mission as it stands right now. And if when we do review wikis, I hope it's something a bit more informative than "this wiki sux", which is approximately the level of usefulness that I see this particular user's comments as being. Please let me know if I get too far off base, though. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 12:51, 7 May 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::After reading the [[Wikia]] article, I was wondering if this wiki was here to list wikis or review them. See [[:Category_talk:Wikia#Criticism|my comments in the Criticism section of the Wikia talk page]]. | |||