1,136
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 08:12, 10 September 2009
, 10 September 2009revert to last edit by lumenos- you just removed information from the "article", don't do that, I was working on merging it but you keep screwing it up worse
m (→Could it be |337 h@x0r5?: duplicate) |
(revert to last edit by lumenos- you just removed information from the "article", don't do that, I was working on merging it but you keep screwing it up worse) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Despite its claims to welcome contributors of all religions, many of its editors are hostile towards religion. | Despite its claims to welcome contributors of all religions, many of its editors are hostile towards religion. | ||
== | ==Similar wikis== | ||
*[[RationalWikiWiki]] meta site for RationalWiki. | *[[RationalWikiWiki]] meta site for RationalWiki. | ||
*[[Debatepedia wiki]] also discusses controversial topics -- but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page. | |||
*[[FreeThoughtPedia]] | |||
*[[Iron Chariots]] | |||
*[[Liberapedia]] started as a parody of [[Conservapedia]]. It is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content. | *[[Liberapedia]] started as a parody of [[Conservapedia]]. It is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content. | ||
*[[Atheism Wiki]] | |||
== | ==Beginning of "talk page" (unless it is moved into the "article")== | ||
RationalWiki is a controversial wiki. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 08:16, 9 July 2009 (EDT) | RationalWiki is a controversial wiki. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 08:16, 9 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
| Line 252: | Line 255: | ||
:I'll change the section title to "Similar wikis". [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:50, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | :I'll change the section title to "Similar wikis". [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:50, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Since you managed to wikilawyer yourself out of my definition, let me rephrase that. Similar wikis should be listed in categories, related wikis should be in the article, either in the text or in the See also section. | ::Since you managed to wikilawyer yourself out of my definition, let me rephrase that. Similar wikis should be listed in categories, related wikis should be in the article, either in the text or in the See also section. | ||
== Criticism and rebuttals == | == Criticism and rebuttals == | ||
| Line 447: | Line 449: | ||
::Sorry to make some work for you but I think the "article" is more organized now. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:39, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ::Sorry to make some work for you but I think the "article" is more organized now. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:39, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::It's not an article, it's a talk page. It's not your job to organize talk pages. In fact you're doing a very bad job. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:43, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | :::It's not an article, it's a talk page. It's not your job to organize talk pages. In fact you're doing a very bad job. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:43, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||