Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
revert removal OF TALK PAGE COMMENTS
(revert to last edit by lumenos- you just removed information from the "article", don't do that, I was working on merging it but you keep screwing it up worse)
(revert removal OF TALK PAGE COMMENTS)
Line 34: Line 34:
Despite its claims to welcome contributors of all religions, many of its editors are hostile towards religion.
Despite its claims to welcome contributors of all religions, many of its editors are hostile towards religion.


==Similar wikis==
==See also==
*[[RationalWikiWiki]] meta site for RationalWiki.
*[[RationalWikiWiki]] meta site for RationalWiki.
*[[Debatepedia wiki]] also discusses controversial topics -- but puts both viewpoints side-by-side on the same page.
*[[FreeThoughtPedia]]
*[[Iron Chariots]]
*[[Liberapedia]] started as a parody of [[Conservapedia]]. It is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content.
*[[Liberapedia]] started as a parody of [[Conservapedia]]. It is a less formal wiki that is inclusive of both humor and serious content.
*[[Atheism Wiki]]


----


==Beginning of "talk page" (unless it is moved into the "article")==
==Talk page==


RationalWiki is a controversial wiki. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 08:16, 9 July 2009 (EDT)
RationalWiki is a controversial wiki. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 08:16, 9 July 2009 (EDT)
Line 255: Line 252:
:I'll change the section title to "Similar wikis". [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:50, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
:I'll change the section title to "Similar wikis". [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:50, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
::Since you managed to wikilawyer yourself out of my definition, let me rephrase that. Similar wikis should be listed in categories, related wikis should be in the article, either in the text or in the See also section.
::Since you managed to wikilawyer yourself out of my definition, let me rephrase that. Similar wikis should be listed in categories, related wikis should be in the article, either in the text or in the See also section.
:::Lumenos, please provide a reason for reverting my edit other than "we don't do it like wikipedia because I say so". I have given a reason for my removal of those wikis: they can be found in the categories. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:46, 10 September 2009 (EDT)


== Criticism and rebuttals ==
== Criticism and rebuttals ==
Line 449: Line 447:
::Sorry to make some work for you but I think the "article" is more organized now. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:39, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
::Sorry to make some work for you but I think the "article" is more organized now. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:39, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
:::It's not an article, it's a talk page. It's not your job to organize talk pages. In fact you're doing a very bad job. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:43, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
:::It's not an article, it's a talk page. It's not your job to organize talk pages. In fact you're doing a very bad job. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:43, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
::::What is my job, Boss? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 03:53, 10 September 2009 (EDT)
174

edits

Navigation menu