User talk:This is not the solution: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 166: Line 166:


Yeah, how about you stop acting like a child, Lumenos? You won the edit war. Can't you be satisfied with this and move on? [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 00:56, 16 September 2009 (EDT)
Yeah, how about you stop acting like a child, Lumenos? You won the edit war. Can't you be satisfied with this and move on? [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 00:56, 16 September 2009 (EDT)
:You, Huw Powel, and Phantom Hoover, don't seem to appreciate my clumsy attempts to dissipate perceived aggression with dorky humor, so I guess I will try to be serious and straightforward. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:15, 16 September 2009 (EDT)
:I didn't know the things listed above, until Dilley clarified those. (Still am not really sure, but afraid to ask for details.) I posted them here because I am not sure that others will check all those places to find the "rules". For example, I sent messages to all the sysops saying that no one wanted the articles protected, not realizing that ''this'' dispute is actually between the administration and the editors (not the editors and each other). Was I the only one that found that confusing? There were actually a number of sysops that "voted for" the plan, at least when the proposal was first made. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:15, 16 September 2009 (EDT)
:You say that I have won an edit war. I guess you mean that because Nx has apparently left, we are gonna have my criticism in the RationalWiki article? I think there would be less edit "warring" or debating, if there were clear inclusion policies or dispute resolution mechanisms. I understand that these may require more work than others are interested in doing. Not sure if I will be able to facilitate the creation of inclusion policies, especially if voting/petitions aren't going to be permitted. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:15, 16 September 2009 (EDT)
:I don't know what you mean by "move on". It could mean:
:*Go away.
:*Don't post to this dispute page anymore.
:*Don't post to the policy development pages anymore.
:*Don't post anything that may be controversial...
::*...in articles.
::*...on talk pages.
:*Don't post ''about'' anything controversial.
:*Don't post many times a day (due to the attention it creates in Recent Changes). I've slowed down a lot, not sure if it is enough.
:[[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:15, 16 September 2009 (EDT)
1,136

edits

Navigation menu