616
edits
User talk:This is not the solution: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
User talk:This is not the solution (edit)
Revision as of 18:41, 16 September 2009
, 16 September 2009→Next steps
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
:*Don't post many times a day (due to the attention it creates in Recent Changes). I've slowed down a lot, not sure if it is enough. | :*Don't post many times a day (due to the attention it creates in Recent Changes). I've slowed down a lot, not sure if it is enough. | ||
:[[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:15, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | :[[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:15, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:: You know very well what I mean. The latter. (Just so you can't say I didn't specify.) Lumenos, you're effectively just spamming now. This isn't getting us anywhere. As for what I mean, I've already stated my position elsewhere, but here it is again: I think criticism (as well as praise) should be allowed in articles as long as it's supported by arguments. As for dispute resolution mechanisms, what stops you from asking for a vote? Oh wait, you already did, and people ''did'' vote. Now someone simply has to act on it. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 14:41, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | |||