1,136
edits
User talk:This is not the solution: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
User talk:This is not the solution (edit)
Revision as of 20:23, 16 September 2009
, 16 September 2009→Next steps
| Line 180: | Line 180: | ||
:[[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:15, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | :[[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:15, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:: You know very well what I mean. The latter. (Just so you can't say I didn't specify.) Lumenos, you're effectively just spamming now. This isn't getting us anywhere. As for what I mean, I've already stated my position elsewhere, but here it is again: I think criticism (as well as praise) should be allowed in articles as long as it's supported by arguments. As for dispute resolution mechanisms, what stops you from asking for a vote? Oh wait, you already did, and people ''did'' vote. Now someone simply has to act on it. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 14:41, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | :: You know very well what I mean. The latter. (Just so you can't say I didn't specify.) Lumenos, you're effectively just spamming now. This isn't getting us anywhere. As for what I mean, I've already stated my position elsewhere, but here it is again: I think criticism (as well as praise) should be allowed in articles as long as it's supported by arguments. As for dispute resolution mechanisms, what stops you from asking for a vote? Oh wait, you already did, and people ''did'' vote. Now someone simply has to act on it. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 14:41, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::You say, "the latter", so that only eliminates "go away". But now I'm wondering whether I am at risk of being disciplined somehow for posting ''anything'', which could be what you are calling "spam". Was that last post "[http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Talk:RationalWikiWiki&diff=prev&oldid=71491 spam]" by your definition? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 16:23, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::There are two ways we can deal with conflict: | |||
:::# You can spread [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt FUD] and maybe anyone involved will get frustrated, leave, or become timid (without really knowing what is permissible). If whoever was hoping to get rid of Proxima and Nx, then this would appear to be "working". [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 16:23, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::# We can define clear inclusion policies and have petitions showing which sysops and editors agree with them. Of course, it is not my place to make this decision but I think WikiIndex would benefit from this course. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 16:23, 16 September 2009 (EDT) | |||